A judge in San Francisco said Trump’s order targeting the popular Chinese-owned app has a “modest” basis in national security and represents a free speech violation for U.S. users of the app.
(Image credit: Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
Related Articles
-
California Voters Give Uber, Lyft A Win But Some Drivers Aren’t So Sure
Uber and Lyft are cheering the passage of Prop 22, which says they don’t have to treat their drivers...
-
-
Antitrust Lawsuits: Google 2020 Vs. Microsoft 1998
NPR’s Tonya Mosley talks with Timothy Wu, a law professor at Columbia University, about similarities between the 2020 antitrust...
-
Biden Tells Putin To Crack Down On Ransomware. What Are The Odds He Will?
The president says the U.S. will respond if it keeps getting hit with cyberattacks linked to Russia. But Putin...
-
Timing At The Olympics Is An Art And A Science
Track and field is set to dominate the last week of the Olympics, and so is the art and...
-
-
Tech workers recount the cost of speaking out, as tensions rise inside companies
More and more tech workers are publicly criticizing their companies. But those who have spoken out say it’s taken...
-
New Book Answers The Questions: Where Did Big Tech Go Wrong, And What Can We Do Next?
Lulu Garcia-Navarro speaks with Stanford University’s Jeremy Weinstein, Mehran Sahami and Rob Reich about their new book, “System Error:...
Recent Comments