These cases raise a critical question for the First Amendment and the future of social media: whether states can force the platforms to carry content they find hateful or objectionable.
(Image credit: Catie Dull)
Related Articles
-
-
Opinion: George Carlin wasn’t predictable, unlike AI
Comedian George Carlin has been dead more than 15 years, but AI George Carlin is out with “new” material....
-
After Weeks Of Being Offline, Parler Finds A New Web Host
The conservative social network is relaunching under new leadership and on new technology, a month after being de-platformed. It...
-
No more ‘just walk out’ at Amazon grocery stores. The new bet is smart shopping carts
The retailer banked big on the cashier-less tech. It’s now out at Amazon Fresh stores in the U.S. But...
-
TikTok removes music from UMG artists, including Olivia Rodrigo and Taylor Swift
TikTok has removed all Universal Music Group music from its platform, according to a spokesperson for the company. UMG...
-
‘Tales of Middle-earth’ tempts and divides ‘Magic’ fans with ‘LotR’ crossover
‘Magic: the Gathering’ partnered with fantasy’s most iconic book series and inspired a bidding war over a special “The...
-
A retro computer museum in Mariupol beloved by children was attacked by Russia
“It’s been a hobby of my life,” said the owner of the retro computer collection that was hit by...
-
How the battle between Russia and Ukraine has developed in cyberspace
Russian soldiers continue to push toward Kyiv. In cyberspace, a volunteer Ukrainian cyber army, hacktivists and cybercriminals are battling...
Recent Comments