In the ruling, Innocent responded that there was no suggestion in the ads that buying Innocent products would lead to a positive environmental impact. Instead, the ruling states that Innocent said the ad was a “call to action”, asking for their drinkers to join them in making changes happen, which was demonstrated by the change of leadership from the man to the otter.
The unemployment rate has unexpectedly risen to its highest level for two and a half years, official figures show....
The garment industry draws more attention because it’s driven by exports and counts some of the world’s biggest brands...
Rival start-up Rocket Lab has bought most of Virgin Orbit’s headquarters in California as well as other assets. The...
Payments were likely to be at a similar level to last year’s £3,000 per MWh, it said, but how...
The UK’s biggest airline, whose services from Heathrow Airport are likely to bear the brunt of this week’s cancellations,...
Dr Bernanke’s review recommends the Bank must thoroughly update its whole framework for forecasting the economy, overhauling or scrapping...
In response to a letter from former postal affairs minister Sir Ed Davey in 2010, Mr Bates wrote back:...
With him in charge, the bank said: “Sri Lanka was able to maintain sound and stable macro-economic fundamentals, with...
Recent Comments